The New Science Diplomacy Protocol: Reference List

References

Abbott, Andrew. 2004. Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. New York/London: Norton. Aukes, Ewert, Sanaz Honarmand Ebrahimi, Gonzalo Ordóñez-Matamoros, and Stefan Kuhlmann. 2020. Towards effective science diplomacy practice. S4D4C Policy Brief no. 2. S4D4C (Vienna). https://www.s4d4c.eu/wp- content/uploads/2020/01/S4D4C-Towards-effective-science-diplomacy- practice.pdf.

Beck, Silke, Tim Forsyth, Pia M. Kohler, Myanna Lahsen, and Martin Mahony. 2017. “The Making of Global Environmental Science and Politics.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 1059-1086. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Beck, Ulrich. 2009. Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter: Neue weltpolitische Ökonomie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Benz, Arthur. 2007. “Governance in Connected Arenas – Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems.” In New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations: Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration, edited by Dorothea Jansen, 3-22. Dordrecht: Springer.

Berkman, Paul Arthur. 2019. “Evolution of Science Diplomacy and its Local-Global Applications.” European Foreign Affairs Review 24 (Special Issue): 63-80. https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/European+Foreign+Affairs+Re view/24.2/EERR2019019.

Blomgren Bingham, Lisa. 2011. “Collaborative Governance.” In The SAGE Handbook of Governance, edited by Mark Bevir, 386-401. Los Angeles: Sage.

Boon, Wouter, and Jakob Edler. 2018. “Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy.” Science and Public Policy 45 (4): 435-447. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy014. Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

Colebatch, Hal K. 2006. “Mapping the work of policy.” In Beyond the Policy Cycle: The policy process in Australia, edited by Hal K. Colebatch, 1-19. Sydney: A&U Academic. Colebatch, Hal K.,

Robert Hoppe, and Mirko Noordegraaf, eds. 2010. Working for Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Collingridge, D.G. 1979. “The entrenchment of technology: the case of lead petrol additives.” Science and Public Policy 6(5): 332–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/6.5.332.

Cooper, Andrew F., Jorge Heine, and Ramesh Thakur. 2013. “Introduction: The Challenges of 21st-Century Diplomacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, edited by Andrew F. Cooper, Jorge Heine and Ramesh Thakur. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Degelsegger-Márquez, Alexander. 2020. “International dimensions of the EU’s FET Flagships: Large-scale strategic research investments as a site of de-facto science diplomacy.” In Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project, edited by Mitchell Young, Tim Flink and Elke Dall. Vienna: S4D4C.

Degelsegger-Márquez, Alexander, Tim Flink, and Charlotte Rungius. 2019. What it takes to do science diplomacy: Practices, identities, needs and challenges of science diplomacy practitioners. Baseline analysis and needs assessment.S4D4C (Vienna).

Dunn, W.N. 2018. Public policy analysis: An integrated approach. New York and London: Routledge. Dunsire, Andrew. 1993. Manipulating Social Tensions: Collibration as an Alternative Mode of Government Intervention.

Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung (Köln). —. 1996. “Tipping the balance: Autopoiesis and Governance.” Administration &Society 28 (3): 299-334.

Ewert, Christian, and Martino Maggetti. 2017. “Regulating side by side: The role of hybrid organisations in transnational environmental sustainability.” Policy and Society 35 (1): 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.12.004.

Fagerberg, Jan. 2018. “Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy.” Research Policy 47 (9):1568-1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012.

Flink, Tim. 2020a. “International Joint Research Programming.” In Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project, edited by Mitchell Young, Tim Flink and Elke Dall. Vienna: S4D4C.

—. 2020b. “The Sensationalist Discourse of Science Diplomacy: A Critical Reflection.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (3): 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10032.

Flink, Tim, and Nicolas Rüffin. 2019. “The current state of the art of science diplomacy.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by Dagmar Simon, Stefan Kuhlmann, Julia Stamm and Weert Canzler, In Handbooks of Research on Public Policy, 104-121. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Flink, Tim, and Ulrich Schreiterer. 2010. “Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches.”(9): 665-677. French, Richard D. 2019. “Is it time to give up on evidence-based policy? Four Science and Public Policy 37 https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210×12778118264530.

Geels, Frank. 2005. “Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930)—a case study in multi-level perspective.” Technology in Society 27 (3): 363-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.008.

Gluckman, Peter D., Vaughan C. Turekian, Robin W. Grimes, and Teruo Kishi.2017. “Science Diplomacy: A Pragmatic Perspective from the Inside.” Science & Diplomacy 6 (4): 1-13. http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2018/pragmatic-perspective.

Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442.

—. 2016. “Social Constructivism and the Evolution of Multilateral Environmental Governance.” In Epistemic Communities, Constructivism, and International Environmental Politics, edited by Peter M. Haas, 121-149. London: Routledge.

Hocking, Brian. 2016. “Diplomacy and Foreign Policy.” In The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy, edited by Costas M. Constantinou, Pauline Kerr and Paul Sharp, 67-78. Los Angeles: Sage.

Hoppe, Robert. 2010. “From “knowledge use” towards “boundary work”: sketch of an emerging new agenda for inquiry into science-policy interaction.” In Knowledge Democracy: Consequences for Science, Politics, and Media, edited by Roeland Jaap In ‘t Veld, 169-186. Heidelberg: Springer.

Jessop, Bob. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Oxford: Blackwell.

—. 2003. “Governance, and meta-governance: on reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony.” In Governance as social and political communication, edited by Henrik P. Bang, 101-116. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

—. 2011. “Metagovernance.” In The SAGE Handbook of Governance, edited by Mark Bevir, 106-123. Los Angeles: SAGE.

—. 2015. “The course, contradictions, and consequences of extending competition as a mode of (meta-)governance: towards a sociology of competition and its limits.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (2): 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2015.1028418.

Kadlecová, Lucie, Nadia Meyer, Rafaël Cos, and Pauline Ravinet. 2020. “Cyber Security: Mapping the Role of Science Diplomacy in the Cyber Field.” In Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project, edited by Mitchell Young, Tim Flink and Elke Dall. Vienna: S4D4C.

Kaltofen, Carolin, and Michele Acuto. 2018. “Science Diplomacy: Introduction to a Boundary Problem.” Global Policy 9: 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758- 5899.12621. Kingdon, John W. 2014. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.

Kuhlmann, Stefan. 2001. “Future governance of innovation policy in Europe – three scenarios.” Research Policy 30: 953-976.

Kuhlmann, Stefan, Patries Boekholt, Luke Georghiou, Ken Guy, Jean-Alain Heraud, Philippe Laredo, Tarmo Lemola, Denis Loveridge, Terttu Luukkonen, António Moniz, Wolfgang Polt, Arie Rip, Luis Sanz-Menendez, and Ruud Smits. 1999. Improving Distributed Intelligence in Complex Innovation Systems. Final Report. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6426/.

Kuhlmann, Stefan, and Arie Rip. 2018. “Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges.” Science and Public Policy 45 (4): 1-7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy011.

Kuhlmann, Stefan, Peter Stegmaier, and Kornelia Konrad. 2019. “The tentative governance of emerging science and technology—A conceptual introduction.” Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.006.

Lindner, Ralf, Stefan Kuhlmann, Sally Randles, Bjørn Bedsted, Guido Gorgoni, Erich Griessler, Allison Loconto, and Niels Mejlgaard, eds. 2016. Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI.

López de San Román, Alea, and Simon Schunz. 2018. “Understanding European Union Science Diplomacy.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (2): 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12582.

Maasen, Sabine, and Peter Weingart, eds. 2005. Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making. Edited by Peter Weingart, Sociology of the Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.

Mayer, Katja. 2020. “Open Science Diplomacy.” In Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project, edited by Mitchell Young, Tim Flink and Elke Dall. Vienna: S4D4C.

McMichael, Philip. 2005. “Globalization.” In The Handbook of Political Sociology: states, civil societies, and globalization, edited by Thomas Janoski, John Alford, Alexander Hicks and Mildred A. Schwartz, 587-606. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Melchor, Lorenzo. 2020. “What Is a Science Diplomat?” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (3): 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10026.

Melchor, Lorenzo, Ana Elorza Moreno, and Izaskun Lacunza. 2020. Calling for a Systemic Change: Towards a European Union Science Diplomacy for Addressing Global Challenges. Version 1.0. S4D4C (Vienna). https://www.s4d4c.eu/calling-for-a-systemic-change-towards-a-eu- science-diplomacy-for-addressing-global-challenges/.

Millwood, P. 2020. “An ‘Exceedingly Delicate Undertaking’: Sino-American Science Diplomacy, 1966–78.” Journal of Contemporary History. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009419888273.

Moomaw, William R. 2018. “Scientist Diplomats or Diplomat Scientists: Who Makes Science Diplomacy Effective?” Global Policy 9: 78-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12520.

Müller, Jan Marco, and Maurizio Bona. 2018. “Past, Present, and Future of Science Diplomacy in Europe.” Science & Diplomacy 7 (3): 7. https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2018/past-present-and- future-science-diplomacy-in-europe.

Nye, Joseph S. 2008. “Public Diplomacy and Soft Power.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699.

Oosterveer, Peter. 2018. “Global Environmental Networks and Flows Addressing Global Environmental Change.” In Environment and Society: Concepts and Challenges, edited by Magnus Boström and Debra J. Davidson, 95-118. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Özkaragöz Doğan, Elif, Zafer Uygun, and İbrahim Semih Akçomak. 2020. “Can science diplomacy address the global climate change challenge?” Environmental Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1911.

Penca, Jerneja. 2018. The rhetoric of “science diplomacy”: Innovation for the EU’s scientific cooperation? EL-CSID (Brussels).

Picot, Arnold, and Stefan Hopf. 2018. “Innovation by the Numbers: Crowdsourcing in the Innovation Process.” In Innovation Society Today: Perspectives, Fields, and Cases, edited by Werner Rammert, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch and Michael Hutter, 183-206. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Ravinet, Pauline, Rafaël Cos, and Mitchell Young. 2020. “The science and diplomacy of global challenges: Food security in EU-Africa relations.” In Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project, edited by Mitchell Young, Tim Flink and Elke Dall. Vienna: S4D4C.

Rein, Martin, and Donald Schön. 1996. “Frame-critical policy analysis and frame- reflective policy practice.” Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 9 (1): 84-104.

Rhodes, Rod A.W. 2007. “Understanding Governance: Ten Years On.” Organization Studies 28 (8): 1243-1264. Robinson, Sam. 2020. “Scientific imaginaries and science diplomacy: The case of ocean exploitation.” Centaurus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12342.

Rüffin, Nicolas. 2020. “EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance: Ambitions, constraints and options for action.” Research Policy 49 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103842.

Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno. 2018. “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Science-Diplomacy Nexus.” Global Policy 9: 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12588.

—. 2020. “Collaboration and Competition: The Twofold Logic of Science Diplomacy.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (3): 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10028.

Rungius, Charlotte. 2020. “SESAME – a synchrotron light source in the Middle East: an international research infrastructure in the making.” In Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project, edited by Mitchell Young, Tim Flink and Elke Dall. Vienna: S4D4C.

Rungius, Charlotte, and Tim Flink. 2020. “Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w.

Rungius, Charlotte, Tim Flink, and Alexander Degelsegger-Márquez. 2018. State- of-the-art report: summarizing literature on science diplomacy cases and concepts. S4D4C (Vienna).

Schot, Johan, and W. Edward Steinmueller. 2018. “Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change.” Research Policy 47 (9): 1554-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.

Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Dvora Yanow. 2012. Interpretive Research Design. Concepts and Processes. Oxford: Routledge.

Seawright, Jason, and John Gerring. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (2): 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.

Shove, Elizabeth, Pantzar. Mika, and Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes. London: Sage.

Šlosarčík, Ivo, Nadia Meyer, and Jennifer Chubb. 2020. “Science diplomacy as a means to tackle infectious diseases: The case of Zika.” In Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project, edited by Mitchell Young, Tim Flink and Elke Dall. Vienna: S4D4C.

Soler, Marga Gual, Cynthia R. Robinson, and Tom C. Wang. 2017. Connecting Scientists to Policy: Landscape Analysis of Mechanisms Around the World Engaging Scientists and Engineers in Policy. Executive Summary. American Association for the Advancement of Science (Washington, D.C.).

Spaapen, J., and L. Van Drooge. 2009. “Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment.” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 211–218.

Stone, Diane. 2020. Making Global Policy. Edited by M. Ramesh, Michael Howlett, Xun Wu, Judith Clifton and Eduardo Araral.Elements in Public Policy.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

The Royal Society. 2010. New frontiers in science diplomacy: Navigating the changing balance of power. The Royal Society (London).

Tomalová, Eliška, Eliška Černovská, Ewert J. Aukes, Jasper Montana, and Elke Dall. 2020. “Water Diplomacy and its Future in the National, Regional, European and Global Environments.” In Science Diplomacy in the Making: Case-based insights from the S4D4C project, edited by Mitchell Young, Tim Flink and Elke Dall. Vienna: S4D4C.

Torgerson, Douglas. 1986. “Interpretive policy inquiry: A response to its limitations.” Policy Sciences 19: 397-405.

Trobbiani, Riccardo, and Constant Hatenboer. 2018. The Future of EU Science Diplomacy: Conceptual and Strategic Reflections. EL-CSID (Brussels).

Turnhout, Esther, and Thomas F. Gieryn. 2019. “Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies.” In Environmental Expertise: Conneceting Science, Policy, and Society, edited by Esther Turnhout, Willemijn Tuinstra and Willem Halffman, 68-81. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.

Van Assche, Kristof, Raoul Beunen, Martijn Duineveld, and Monica Gruezmacher. 2017. “Power/knowledge and natural resource management: Foucaultian foundations in the analysis of adaptive governance.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19 (3): 308-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2017.1338560.

Van de Ven, Andrew, Douglas E. Polley, Raghu Garud, and Sankaran Venkataraman. 2008. The Innovation Journey. New York: Oxford University Press.

Van Genderen, Ruben, and Jan Rood. 2011. Water Diplomacy: a Niche for the Netherlands? Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ (The Hague).

Van Lieshout, Maartje, Art Dewulf, Noelle Aarts, and Catrien Termeer. 2014. “The Power to Frame the Scale? Analysing Scalar Politics over, in and of a Deliberative Governance Process.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2014.936581.

Walker, Karen. 2015. “The Rhetorical Work of Science Diplomacy: Border Crossing and Propheteering for U.S.-Muslim Engagement.” Poroi 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1238.

Wanzenböck, Iris, and Koen Frenken. 2018. The subsidiarity principle: Turning challenge-oriented innovation policy on its head. Utrecht University (Utrecht).

Wesselink, Anna, Hal Colebatch, and Warren Pearce. 2014. “Evidence and policy: discourses, meanings and practices.” Policy Sciences 47 (4): 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9209-2.

Wilder, M.O., R.G. Varady, A.K. Gerlak, S.P. Mumme, K.W. Flessa, A.A. Zuniga- Teran, C.A. Scott, N.P. Pablos, and S.B. Megdal. 2020. “Hydrodiplomacy and adaptive governance at the U.S.-Mexico border: 75 years of tradition and innovation in transboundary water management.” Environmental Science and Policy 112: 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.013.

Young, Mitchell. 2020. Building Better Science Diplomacy for Global Challenges: insights from the COVID-19 crisis. S4D4C POLICY BRIEF, June 2020. (Vienna: S4D4C). https://www.s4d4c.eu/policy-brief-building-better- science-diplomacy-for-global-challenges-insights-from-the-covid-19- crisis/.

Young, Mitchell, Charlotte Rungius, Ewert J. Aukes, Lorenzo Melchor, Elke Dall, Eliška Černovská, Eliška Tomolová, Laure-Anne Plumhans, Pauline Ravinet, Tim Flink, and Ana Elorza Moreno. 2020. The ‘Matters’ of Science Diplomacy: Transversal Analysis of the S4D4C Case Studies. S4D4C (Vienna).